School Science and Mathematics
Official Journal of the School Science and Mathematics Association, founded 1901 |
|||||||||||
AbstractsConstruction and Validity of Geometry Attitude Scales Juliana Utley The purpose of this study was to develop and establish the validity and reliability of an instrument to measure students' attitudes toward geometry. Participants consisted of 264 undergraduate students from two universities, one in the Midwest and one in the Southwest. The instrument is a 5-point Likert-scaled survey consisting of 32 statements and 3 subscales. The internal consistency using Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.95 for the confidence subscale, 0.93 for the usefulness subscale, and 0.92 for the enjoyment subscale. For the overall instrument using the 32 items that comprised the three subscales, internal consistency reliability analysis revealed a Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.96. Additionally, this article reports on the content, criterion, and construct validity of the instrument. High School Biology Students' Knowledge and Certainty about Diffusion and Osmosis Concepts Arthur L. Odom & Lloyd H. Barrow The purpose of this study was to investigate students' understanding about scientifically acceptable content knowledge by exploring the relationship between knowledge of diffusion and osmosis and the student's certainty in their content knowledge. Data was collected from a high school biology class with the Diffusion and Osmosis Diagnostic Test (DODT) and Certainty of Response (CRI) scale. All data was collected after completion of a unit of study on diffusion and osmosis. The results of the DODT were dichotomized into correct and incorrect answers, and CRI values were dichotomized into certain and uncertain. Values were used to construct a series of 2 X 2 contingency tables for each item on the DODT and corresponding CRI. High certainty in incorrect answers on the DODT indicated tenacious misconceptions about diffusion and osmosis concepts. Low certainty in incorrect or correct answers on the DODT indicated possible guessing; and, therefore no understanding, or confusion about their understanding. Chi-square analyses revealed that significantly more students had misconceptions than desired knowledge on content covering the Influence of Life Forces on Diffusion and Osmosis, Membranes, the Particulate and Random Nature of Matter, and the Processes of Diffusion and Osmosis. Most students were either guessing or had misconceptions about every item related to the concepts osmosis and tonicity. Osmosis and diffusion are important to understanding fundamental biology concepts, but the concept of tonicity not be introduced to high school biology students until effective instructional approaches can be identified by researchers. Crutch or Catalyst: Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding Calculator use in Mathematics Instruction E. Todd Brown et al. This study investigated K-12 teachers' beliefs and reported teaching practices regarding calculator use in their mathematics instruction. A survey was administered to more than 800 elementary, middle and high school teachers in a large metropolitan area to address the following questions: (a) what are the beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers regarding calculator use? and (b) how do these beliefs and practices differ among teachers in three grade bands? Factor analysis of 20 Likert scale items revealed four factors that accounted for 54% of the variance in the ratings. These factors were named Catalyst Beliefs, Teacher Knowledge, Crutch Beliefs, and Teacher Practices. Compared to elementary teachers, high school teachers were significantly higher in their perception of calculator use as a catalyst in mathematics instruction. However, the higher the grade level of the teacher, the higher the mean score on the perception that calculator use may be a way of getting answers without understanding mathematical processes. The mean scores for teachers in all three grade bands indicated agreement that students can learn mathematics through calculator use and using calculators in instruction will lead to better student understanding and make mathematics more interesting. The survey results shed light on teachers' self reported beliefs, knowledge, and practices in regard to consistency with elements of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) technology principle and the NCTM use of technology position paper (2003). This study extended previous research on teachers' beliefs regarding calculator use in classrooms by examining and comparing the results of teacher surveys across three grade bands. |
|||||||||||
|
Updated on 2008-06-12 || TAMU homepage || Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture || Webmaster || |
|||||||||||