Elementary Teachers' Progressive Understanding of Inquiry through the Process of Reflection

Christine Moseley & Sarah J. Ramsey

What is inquiry? Although many teachers are using inquiry based curricula, often they have not engaged in answering or personalizing this question. This study examined teachers' changing definitions of inquiry over a semester using the process of guided reflection. Through inquiry experiences and reflection, these teachers developed and communicated a more sophisticated understanding of inquiry. The findings suggest that conscious consideration of what inquiry means assisted teachers in broadening their perceptions of inquiry in four distinct aspects: 1) inquiry is a coherent process consisting of particular actions, 2) inquiry exists on a continuum, 3) the goal of inquiry is science conceptual development, and 4) inquiry provides a context for building connections between those engaged in inquiry, science and other content areas, and science and life.

Measuring K-8 Teachers' Perceptions of Discourse Use in Their Mathematics Classes

Mary P. Truxaw, Nicholas Gorgievski, & Thomas C. DeFranco

This article documents the development and use of a survey instrument designed to measure K-8 mathematics teachers' perceptions about discourse in mathematics classes. In particular, the 5-point Likert-type survey sought to address teachers' perceptions of their use of dialogic (dialogue to construct new meaning), univocal (conveying information), and general discourse in their mathematics classes. Factor analysis revealed three reliable factors that were compatible with the original constructs, these include: dialogic discourse (α3 = .67), univocal discourse (α1 = .83), and general discourse (α2 = .68). These results suggest a framework that could be used to uncover K-8 teachers' perceptions of their use of discourse in mathematics instruction, especially if there is interest in tendencies toward univocal or dialogic discourse. In addition to research implications, the survey could be used to inform the design and implementation of teacher professional development that focuses on discourse in mathematics instruction.

Middle Grade Students' Interpretations of Contour Maps

Glenda Carter, Michelle Cook, John C. Park, Eric N. Wiebe, & Susan M. Butler

This study examined eighth graders' approach to three tasks implemented to assist students with learning to interpret contour maps. Students' approach to and interpretation of these three tasks were analyzed qualitatively. When students were rank ordered according to their scores on a standardized test of spatial ability, the Minnesota Paper Form Board Task (Likert & Quasha, 1948), evidence emerged that spatial ability was related to how students interpreted the tasks. Students with the relatively lowest spatial ability scores had difficulty picking out the relevant features of the representations used for instruction and despite scaffolding attempts by peers remained unclear about their interpretation. Students with relatively higher spatial ability were able to pick out salient features of the representations used for instruction which resulted in their learning to read and interpret contour maps.