Volume 105 (6), October 2005

Table of Contents

Abstract

The Role of Afterschool and Community Science Programs in the Lives of Urban Youth

Jr�ne Rahm, UniversitŽ de MontrŽal, FacultŽ des sciences de l’Žducation

Marie-Paule Martel-Reny, Concordia University

John C. Moore, University of Northern Colorado

Afterschool and community science programs have become widely recognized as important sanctuaries for science learning for low-income urban youth and as offering them with “missing opportunities.” Yet, more needs to be known about how youth, themselves, perceive such opportunities. What motivates youth to seek out such opportunities in the nonschool hours? How do youth describe the doing and talking of science in such programs? Given such descriptions, how do youth perceive the role of these programs in their lives? This paper relies on stories from three youth drawn from a multisited ethnographic study, one site being an afterschool girls-only science program at the elementary level in Canada and the other an Upward Bound Math and Science program in the USA. The paper concludes with a discussion about the ways these programs offered youth a meaningful way to relate to science in concordance with their own lived experiences, resulting in “I will” and “I can” attitudes and a sense of hope for the future within which science becomes a tool for action.

Uncovering Student Ownership in Science Learning: The Making of a Student created Mini-Documentary

Tara O’Neill, Teachers College, Columbia University

Angela Calabrese Barton, Teachers College, Columbia University

An important challenge in urban science education is finding ways to engage all students in the learning of science. However, research in this area has consistenly shown that around middle school student engagement in science wanes. Using critical ethnographic methods this study reveals how students cultivate a sense of ownership in an informal science video project. Student ownership of what they they learn plays an important role in how they engage in the learning environment. In this study ownership  is characterized by five themes, and the notion of student ownership science is challenged as an outcome. Ownership is defined as a complex, multifaceted process that captures the relationships that students build between themselves, as youth and as learners, with science as the subject they aspire to participate in and with the context in which that participation takes place.

Boundary Spanners as Bridges of Student and School Discourses in an Urban Science and Mathematics High School

Cory A. Buxton, University of Miami

Heidi B. Carlone,  University of North Carolina at Greensboro

David Carlone, University of North Carolina at Greensboro

A key to improving urban science and mathematics education is to facilitate the mutual understanding of the participants involved and then look for strategies to bridge differences. Educators need new theoretical tools to do so. In this paper the argument is made that the concept of “boundary spanner” is such a tool. Boundary spanners are individuals, objects, media, and other experiences that link an organization to its environment. They serve critical communicative roles, such as bridges for bringing distinct discourses together, cultural guides to make discourses of the “other” more explicit, and change agents for potentially reshaping participants’ discourses. This ethnographic study provides three examples of boundary spanners found in the context of an urban public high school of science, mathematics, and technology: boundary media, boundary objects, and boundary experiences. The analysis brings to the foreground students’ and teachers’ distinct discourses about “good student identity,” “good student work,” and “good summer experience” and demonstrates how boundary spanners shaped, were shaped by, and sometimes brought together participants’ distinct discourses. An argument is made for boundary spanners’ practical and theoretical utility: practically, as a tool for enhancing meaning-making between diverse groups, and theoretically, as a heuristic tool for understanding the reproductive and transformative aspects of urban science education.

Go to Table of Contents